Trump slammed for posting racist video depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as monkeys!

The political landscape in the United States has been thrust into a renewed state of volatility following a controversial social media post by Donald Trump. On February 6, 2026, a video shared on the former president’s Truth Social account sparked an immediate and intense national debate, drawing widespread condemnation for its use of imagery that many have categorized as overtly racist. The clip, which lasted approximately one minute, primarily focused on the recurring and legally rejected claims regarding the 2020 presidential election. However, it was a brief, two-second segment toward the conclusion of the video that ignited a firestorm: an animation depicting former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama with their faces superimposed onto the bodies of monkeys.

The imagery, set to the rhythmic cadence of the song “The Lion Sleeps Tonight,” immediately bypassed the standard partisan bickering to touch a raw nerve in the American psyche. For historians, sociologists, and civil rights advocates, the comparison of Black individuals to primates is not merely an insult but a deeply rooted racist trope used for centuries to dehumanize and marginalize Black people. Critics argue that such imagery, when disseminated by a figure of Trump’s stature, transcends simple political satire and enters the realm of systemic harm.

The backlash was swift and multi-faceted, cutting across political lines while highlighting the deep fissures in the country’s social fabric. California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office released a sharp rebuke, characterizing the post as “disgusting behavior” and challenging Republican leadership to distance themselves from the rhetoric. Political strategists and commentators echoed these sentiments, with many arguing that the intent behind the imagery was unmistakable. Adam Parkhomenko, a prominent political strategist, noted that the brevity of the segment did not diminish its impact, suggesting that the choice of animated characters was a deliberate attempt to utilize historical prejudice under the guise of online meme culture.

On social media, the reaction served as a microcosm of the national divide. Truth Social, the platform where the video originated, saw a surge in engagement, with the post garnering tens of thousands of likes and shares within hours of its release. While many users defended the post as a “Lion King” themed parody intended to frame Trump as the rightful “King of the Jungle” and his political rivals as secondary jungle characters, others expressed profound disillusionment. Some users, identifying as former Trump voters, voiced regret, stating that the use of such racially charged tropes made it impossible to support the former president’s platform.

The White House, represented by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, attempted to neutralize the controversy by framing it as a misunderstanding of internet subculture. Leavitt characterized the outcry as “fake outrage,” suggesting that the video was a harmless meme meant to be a humorous commentary on political dynamics. The administration’s stance was that the public’s focus should remain on pressing national issues rather than a fleeting digital animation. This defense, however, did little to appease those who pointed out that memes do not exist in a vacuum and that the selection of primates specifically for the Obamas carried historical baggage that cannot be easily dismissed as accidental.

This incident is part of a broader, more frenetic period of communication from Trump, who reportedly made over 60 posts within a three-hour window on the same day. This digital blitz included everything from renewed attacks on Dominion Voting Systems and promotion for an upcoming Super Bowl advertisement to a suggestion that his likeness be added to Mount Rushmore. The sheer volume of content often serves to dilute the impact of individual controversies, but the “monkey” imagery has proven to have a longer shelf life due to its visceral nature.

From a statistical perspective, the controversy highlights the demographic sensitivities that define modern American elections. In the 2020 election, the Black electorate voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic ticket, with approximately 92% supporting Joe Biden. Messaging that utilizes historically racist tropes can have a measurable impact on voter sentiment and turnout. Furthermore, recent polling suggests that a significant majority of Americans—roughly 65% in some non-partisan surveys—believe that racial tensions have increased over the last decade. Incidents like this Truth Social post are frequently cited by sociologists as contributing factors to that perceived decline in social cohesion.

The silence from Barack and Michelle Obama has been notable. Historically, the former First Couple has maintained a policy of dignity and restraint in the face of personal attacks, often choosing to speak through their philanthropic work or broad policy statements rather than engaging in the “mud-slinging” of the 24-hour news cycle. Their lack of response, however, has not prevented the issue from becoming a central talking point for civil rights organizations like the NAACP, which described the video as a “step backward” for the country’s racial progress.

For supporters of the former president, the video represents a form of “anti-woke” defiance—a rejection of what they perceive as overly sensitive “political correctness.” They argue that the video was clearly a parody and that the race of the subjects should not make them immune to caricature. This perspective often views the backlash itself as a political weapon used by the left to distract from debates over election integrity and economic policy.

Conversely, the controversy underscores the ongoing challenge of defining the boundaries of political speech in the digital age. When does a meme become a tool for harassment? When does satire cross the line into racial provocation? For many, the answer lies in the historical context of the imagery used. The trope of the “primate” comparison has been used to justify everything from slavery to Jim Crow laws, making its appearance in modern political discourse especially jarring for those who study American history.

As the nation moves closer to the next election cycle, the intensity of this rhetoric shows no signs of waning. The episode highlights the reality that in today’s political environment, the line between an official statement and an internet meme is increasingly non-existent. For some, this is a refreshing form of authenticity; for others, it is a dangerous degradation of the office of the presidency. Regardless of the interpretation, the visual of the Obamas as monkeys remains a potent symbol of the deep-seated divisions and unresolved racial tensions that continue to shape the United States in 2026.